Gun Control Laws Are Not Enforceable Essay - 2011 Words

On June twelfth, this year the world woke up to the tragic news of a mass shooting in Orlando, Florida. A twenty-three-year-old man, Omar Mateen, opened fire at a popular gay nightclub in downtown Orlando known as Pulse. Acting alone Mateen used an AR-15 assault rifle and a handgun. By the time law enforcement could stop him fifty people were killed and fifty others were injured. This incident is dubbed the nation’s deadliest mass shooting in history. Shocked from this event and others the nation called upon its leaders to make a change in gun control law. Gun control has become the main topic for debate among lawmakers and citizens across the country due to the deadly attacks within the last decade. Many people debate issues of the Second Amendment and a variety of other subtopics related to gun control and gun rights. Gun control laws are not enforceable because there are too many variations in laws and opinions across the country. Complications in the interpretation of the Second Amendment, other federal laws, differences between state laws and level of restrictiveness all add to the confusion and complications of gun control in the United States. The issue of gun control is complex within itself because each state has their own laws and set of restrictions. But to understand gun control one must understand the foundation for gun laws which comes from the Second Amendment. The Amendment states â€Å"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State,Show MoreRelatedThe Battle Between Gun Control and Gun Rights Essay1113 Words   |  5 Pagescertain categories of firearms, as well as mandate who may and may not own a gun (Gale Encyclopedia, pg. 155-162).† Therefore, the issue is one that is extremely hard to clarify. Which side is right? An estimated 30,000 people are killed each year by guns in the United States alone according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Gun Control, Funk Wagnall’s). Though there have been some restrictions and laws placed, both the conservative and liberal sides are not pleased with eitherRead MoreAgenda Setting : Missouri Gun Control1682 Words   |  7 Pages Agenda Setting: Missouri Gun Control Peyton Flewelling University of Missouri at Columbia Agenda Setting: Missouri Gun Control The efforts of gun control advocates have been undermined largely by the persistent presence of those arguing the 2nd Amendment protects their Constitutional right to bear the majority of arms in almost every setting. This has occurred despite an ever-changing social climate, where gun violence occurs daily. Automatic, semi-automatic, and assault weaponsRead MorePersuasive Essay Against Gun Control1934 Words   |  8 PagesA law that would outlaw guns would be a more of a disadvantage to the law-abiding citizens than it would be to the criminals. If a law like that would be enacted, the criminals would not stop carrying guns but the pleasant citizens of the United States would. Currently, there is three major laws that prohibit specific firearms. The National Firearms Act of 1934 restricts citizens from possessing automatic weapons, hand grenades and other powerful arms. There is another federal law, The Gun ControlRead MoreThe Issue Of Gun Control1912 Words   |  8 PagesGun cont rol, thanks to media outlets and recent events that have occurred in our homeland has become a topic of great controversy. There are people that are going to the extremes to express their opinions, and it’s causing a group polarization in our country. We feel that we are actually â€Å"at war† with those on the opposite side of the fence. Unfortunately neither side is getting the full picture. We have news sources like Fox News and CNN that go extreme right and left it’s hard to tell what is whatRead MoreRatification Of The Constitutional Convention Stipulating Essay2264 Words   |  10 Pageslegislature, if they can relate it to interstate commerce; enacted with elastic clause, enables Congress to make laws about abortion, gun control, gay marriage→ all pertaining to commerce i.e. gun control, technically Congress cannot regulate guns, but they argue for or against guns based on the argument that guns sold can be traveled across state lines and influence another state economy → ergo gun regulation Concurrent powers Authority possessed by both state and national gov.ts that may be exercisedRead MoreGuns Dont Kill People, People Kill People and Other Nonsensical Rhetoric2066 Words   |  9 PagesGuns Don’t Kill People, People Kill People And Other Nonsensical Rhetoric The intent and historical relevance of the Second Amendment should be carefully considered against modern day situations and circumstances surrounding gun violence. Whether you believe the Second Amendment gives unequivocal rights to individuals to bear arms or that it only pertains to states militia and firearms should be tightly regulated by the government, reasonable measures should be taken to minimize the harm causedRead MorePresident Obamas Thoughts On Gun Control And Gun Policies2038 Words   |  9 PagesPresident Obamas thoughts on gun control and gun policies Brayden Dowding Archway Seminar-The Obama Presidency December 1, 2016 President Obamas thoughts on gun control and gun policies During president Obamas time in office, one of the big things he has talked about is the control on guns, and weather we should have the right to keep them, or have them taken away. President Obama has made a couple different stands on this. I want to know if his policies have made America more happy andRead MorePersuasive Essay On Gun Control2013 Words   |  9 PagesIs increasing gun control the answer to stopping criminal acts of gun violence? Or is there a better solution? The many recent tragic events involving gun violence have made the debate between gun control and gun rights to be at an all-time high. The most recent and deadliest example of gun violence, still fresh in peoples’ minds, occurred in Las Vegas, Nevada where 59 lives were lost, and 441 people were injured. Other recent occurrences include the San Bernardino attacks in which deadly fully automaticRead MoreCase Analysis : Truck Driver And Trucking Company Essay2356 Words   |  10 PagesPhysical duress i s coercion involving physical force or the threat of physical force. The person is in fear that the wrongful act will be carried out therefore they end up entering into a contract. The law will not enforce any contract induced by duress. So the physical duress i.e. pointing a gun at someone’s head renders this agreement void. Anthony caused further duress to the President of the company. He forced the vice president to take the agreement to the president of the company wake himRead MoreThe Discussion Of Gun Control3088 Words   |  13 PagesConnor Wells Dr. Elizabeth Sachs English 101 16 December 2014 Gun Control In the discussion of gun control, one of the main controversial issues is whether or not there should be more or less regulations put on firearms. In addition, another issue that comes up is whether or not those regulations will have a benefit on society. One one hand, gun regulation proponents believe that stricter regulations restricting the types of firearms and ammunition that can be purchased will reduce the amounts

Boko Haram A Threat Of Western Civilization - 3365 Words

â€Å"Conflict is not something separate from organization; disintegration implies integration. Inherit in the whole problem of conflict are such phenomena as power, leadership, and the elite† (International Sociological Association, 34). This year, 2015, began at exactly 12:00 am, January 1st. While some people were out enjoying the celebrations that a new year had finally come and forgetting their worries that the past year had given them, a little church in Gombe, Nigeria was in shambles. A suicide bomber had strapped explosives to his body and attended a New Year service intended for Christian worshipers (Abubakar). Gombe is located in the northeastern region of Nigeria; northern Nigeria is an established Islamic region. Islamic extremist†¦show more content†¦The rural population’s density per square kilometer of arable land in Nigeria is 0.0. The percentage of sanitation facilities in rural areas of Nigeria, as of 2008 is 28 percent. In Nigeria, almost 100 million people live on one dollar a day. Most of the poverty is concentrated in the northern areas of Nigeria, for example, the state of Sokoto, which has a poverty rate at about 86.4 percent. The term absolute poverty is â€Å"the number of th ose who can only afford the bare essentials such as food, shelter, and clothing† (IFDA). The percentage of people living in absolute poverty, in the already poor areas of Nigeria in 2004 was 54.7 percent, and as of 2012, the number had grown to 60.9 percent. This number is expected to continue rising. This trend in the country has startled many due to the fact that although the economy in Nigeria is growing, most Nigerians are just getting poorer. This fact alone shows that there are other factors involved, factors that are resulting in the disruption of the progress of Nigeria. The cause of poverty in Nigeria is a result of multiple factors that overlap and run deep within the history and culture of Nigeria, which makes it difficult for the cycle of poverty to stop, yet, by understanding some of the main causes of poverty in Nigeria, anthropologist can suggest ways in which poverty can be decreased. Analysts have reviewed the country in an attempt to figure out why Nigeria is getting poorer, and many have come to some basic

Illegal War In Kosovo Essay Example For Students

Illegal War In Kosovo Essay President Clinton addressed the people of the United States on June 10, 1999 over the United States’ mission in Kosovo. Kosovo is a province of Serbia, which makes this war a civil war. Highlights of his speech outline the goals that he wanted to obtain in this Humanitarian intervention, as he called it. The mission had flaws innate to it from the beginning. The three-tiered goal of the President was clearly stated. The first is to allow the Kosovar people back into their homes. The second is to require Serbian forces to leave Kosovo. The last thing was to deploy an international security force, with NATO at its core, to protect all the people that troubled the land, Serbians and Albanians alike. The message was clear, but was not followed in regards to international law, and NATO’s Charter, and even the three clearly stated missions. The involvement in Kosovo’s war is illegal, and the President of the United States has pushed NATO into committing wartime crimes and has used the Powers-of-Office in an unconstitutional manner, which resulted in the illegal intervention of a sovereign state. On March 24, 1999, the united countries of North Atlantic Treaty Organization, under pressure from the United States, launched an illegal assault upon a sovereign nation. The evidence is overwhelming that leaders within the United State government sponsored this decision with the extreme perseverance from President of the United States. NATO should have dismissed the request for assault and involvement for it was clearly illegal. It’s perpetrators showed total disregard for Article One of the NATO Charter, which incorporates by reference the United Nations Charter, Chapter One, Article Two, Sections Three, Four and Seven. These sections make it clear that NATO’s role is to be purely defensive. The aggression that NATO has undertaken did not come from or with approval of the UN Security Council, which NATO’s Charter clearly states nume rous times that the UN Security Council will convene and approve of any such matter or action. It is a brutal violation of NATO’s Charter and of all principles of international law. NATO used military weapons and tactics that run counter to the demands of decency and the nature of a moral people. Cluster bombs are outright illegal. Geneva Convention has concluded the use of cluster bombs and anti-tank and anti-personnel mines as illegal munitions. Cluster bombs and mines have a five percent failure to diffuse, which leads to civilian casualties. In addition, the sheer massiveness of the attacks that has resulted in over 2000 civilian casualties and many more injured, coupled with the use of depleted uranium weapons and the bombing of chemical plants has raised legitimate environmental concerns in addition to the horror that it spelled for its victims. Toxic clouds drifted into other countries causing further violations on human rights and clear disregard for the purpose of NA TO’s intervention. This disregard for the human rights and NATO’s aggression comes in direct violation of several Treaties, and Charters. To name a few that this war has violated is the Geneva Convention, Nuremberg Decisions, NATO Charter, United Nations Charter, and United States Constitution. Atrocities against Serbs continue, often at the hands of Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army who has taken charge in Kosovo. NATO camps were to be established for refugees Kosovo, but have been turned into KLA’s military depots and safeguard camps. This is in direct opposition to the mission that was to protect every troubled person Serbians and Albanians alike. Kosovo Force (KFOR) troops now occupy their land due to a coerced treaty. KFOR troops have looked on or offered only token assistance to Serbian citizens. NATOs brutal aggression against Yugoslavia is murdering hundreds of people, amongst them children, elderly and women. It is destroying cities and villages, populate d quarters, factories, houses, hospitals, schools, cultural and historical monuments, installations for the provision of water, railroads, bridges, and communication centers. This does not sound as if NATO is trying to stop a war or even intervene based on humanitarian rights. The facts point towards a gross execution of a one sided agenda, which screams save the Albanians. .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .postImageUrl , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:hover , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:visited , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:active { border:0!important; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:active , .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0304887b2e9230d443fd6fc312ab378e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: To Build a Fire Essay The United States President not only pushed for an illegal attack on a sovereign state, but also used the Powers-of-Office in an unconstitutional manner by declaring war on Serbia. Any conflict that introduces United States forces into hostilities for more than 60 days is considered an act of aggression or war. Article One; Section Eight of the United States Constitution gives Congress the sole power to declare war. The execution of an Executive Order allows the President to deploy troops in a war for only 60 days. Any further delays and the Congress have to vote on whether to go to war or pull out United States troops. Congress has voted on declaring war on Yugoslavia and has been rejected a wide margin. President Clinton has not pulled out United States troops, but rather is sending 2000 more troops to Kosovo. This act is in direct violation of the Constitution of the United States and War Power Act of 1973. The war against Yugoslavia serves to strengthen imperialism militarily and economically, not only in Europe but also in relation to the strategic areas of the Middle East and the former Soviet Union. It is the first open NATO war of aggression in its 50 years of history, and it includes the first combat role of German troops on foreign soil since the defeat of Hitler’s totalitarianism. The United States NATO war has resulted in the military occupation of the former Peoples Socialist Republic of Albania, has turned Albania into the main military base of imperialism in its aggression against Yugoslavia, and has brought new life to a Hitler concept of a Greater Albania. NATO and the United States have clearly proven to commit illegal international acts that resemble agendas of terrorist organizations. NATOs leaders should be brought before an International Court as war criminals, responsible for aggression against the sovereign state of Yugoslavia. The United States President should be tried before Congress for enacting illegal Powers-of-Office. NATO also should pull its forces out of Kosovo immediately until just punishment and appropriate measures can be resolved. If NATO is allowed to continue its reign and fight for Albanian refugees, then all countries that enter into a civil war conflict will be at risk of NATO’s wrath. English Essays